(no subject)
Oct. 6th, 2010 06:18 pmCouncilor: Councilor Sheila
Bill To Propose: Professinally-up the Cafeteria worker standards.
Additional Notes: Really! I heard the current schlubs they got in the cafeteria cooked some rats with the corn dogs - caused our intern to get crook 'n' our dwarven agents weren't happy about the lack of ketchup on those rats either. It's high-time we actually get some trained chefs there. This bill will allot a small bit of funding from the Arts fund to hire one high-rated professional chef to be in charge of the kitchens, 'n' will require all workers under the chef to be certified in handling tucker. None of this grab whoever's not busy nonsense.
Bill To Propose: Professinally-up the Cafeteria worker standards.
Additional Notes: Really! I heard the current schlubs they got in the cafeteria cooked some rats with the corn dogs - caused our intern to get crook 'n' our dwarven agents weren't happy about the lack of ketchup on those rats either. It's high-time we actually get some trained chefs there. This bill will allot a small bit of funding from the Arts fund to hire one high-rated professional chef to be in charge of the kitchens, 'n' will require all workers under the chef to be certified in handling tucker. None of this grab whoever's not busy nonsense.
DISCUSSION
Date: 2010-10-07 01:43 am (UTC)Re: DISCUSSION
Date: 2010-10-07 01:45 am (UTC)Of course we should have real chefs! A-and maybe some sort of quality control and inspections, too!
Re: DISCUSSION
Date: 2010-10-07 01:45 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Re: DISCUSSION
Date: 2010-10-07 01:49 am (UTC)Ah, I believe there's more of a problem if the rats aren't cooked deliberately, father.
Oh, I suppose i can understand that. ...ye gads!
Re: DISCUSSION
From:Re: DISCUSSION
From:Re: DISCUSSION
From:Re: DISCUSSION
From:Re: DISCUSSION
From:Re: DISCUSSION
Date: 2010-10-07 01:49 am (UTC)Re: DISCUSSION
From:Re: DISCUSSION
From:Re: DISCUSSION
From:Re: DISCUSSION
From:Re: DISCUSSION
From:Re: DISCUSSION
Date: 2010-10-07 02:01 am (UTC)WE DON'T HAVE THE BUDGET FOR SUCH TRIVIAL NONSENSE.
Re: DISCUSSION
From:Re: DISCUSSION
From:Re: DISCUSSION
From:Re: DISCUSSION
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-10-07 02:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Re: DISCUSSION
Date: 2010-10-07 03:37 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:Re: DISCUSSION
Date: 2010-10-07 04:35 am (UTC)Re: DISCUSSION
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-10-07 06:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:VOTING
Date: 2010-10-07 01:44 am (UTC)Re: VOTING
Date: 2010-10-07 01:44 am (UTC)Re: VOTING
Date: 2010-10-07 01:45 am (UTC)Re: VOTING
Date: 2010-10-07 01:46 am (UTC)Re: VOTING
Date: 2010-10-07 01:49 am (UTC)Re: VOTING
Date: 2010-10-07 01:50 am (UTC)Re: VOTING
Date: 2010-10-07 01:53 am (UTC)Re: VOTING
Date: 2010-10-07 02:03 am (UTC)Re: VOTING
Date: 2010-10-07 02:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-07 02:06 am (UTC)Re: VOTING
Date: 2010-10-07 02:07 am (UTC)Re: VOTING
Date: 2010-10-07 02:12 am (UTC)Re: VOTING
Date: 2010-10-07 03:38 am (UTC)Re: VOTING
Date: 2010-10-07 04:27 am (UTC)Re: VOTING
Date: 2010-10-07 06:37 am (UTC)Re: VOTING
From: